THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
SINGLE AUDIT OF THE
STATE OF ILLINOIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2008
By conducting independent and objective audits, evaluations and investigations, we inspire public confidence in the integrity and security of SSA’s programs and operations and protect them against fraud, waste and abuse. We provide timely, useful and reliable information and advice to Administration officials, Congress and the public.
The Inspector General Act created independent audit and investigative units, called the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The mission of the OIG, as spelled out in the Act, is to:
Conduct and supervise independent and objective audits and investigations relating to agency programs and operations.
Promote economy, effectiveness, and efficiency within the agency.
Prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse in agency programs and operations.
Review and make recommendations regarding existing and proposed legislation and regulations relating to agency programs and operations.
Keep the agency head and the Congress fully and currently informed of problems in agency programs and operations.
To ensure objectivity, the IG Act empowers the IG with:
Independence to determine what reviews to perform.
Access to all information necessary for the reviews.
Authority to publish findings and recommendations based on the reviews.
We strive for continual improvement in SSA’s programs, operations and management by proactively seeking new ways to prevent and deter fraud, waste and abuse. We commit to integrity and excellence by supporting an environment that provides a valuable public service while encouraging employee development and retention and fostering diversity and innovation.
Date: March 26, 2010 Refer To:
To: Candace Skurnik
Audit Management and Liaison Staff
From: Inspector General
Subject: Management Advisory Report: Single Audit of the State of Illinois for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008 (A-77-10-00005)
This report presents the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) portion of the single audit of the State of Illinois for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2008. Our objective was to report internal control weaknesses, noncompliance issues, and unallowable costs identified in the single audit to SSA for resolution action.
KPMG LLP performed the audit. The results of the desk review conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) concluded that the audit met Federal requirements. In reporting the results of the single audit, we relied entirely on the internal control and compliance work performed by KPMG LLP and the reviews performed by HHS. We conducted our review in accordance with the Quality Standards for Inspections issued by the President’s Council on Integrity and Efficiency.
For single audit purposes, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) assigns Federal programs a Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number. SSA’s Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs are identified by CFDA number 96. SSA is responsible for resolving single audit findings reported under this CFDA number.
The Illinois Disability Determination Services (DDS) performs disability determinations under SSA’s DI and SSI programs in accordance with Federal regulations. The DDS is reimbursed for 100 percent of allowable costs. The Department of Human Services (DHS) is the DDS’ parent agency.
The single audit reported that DHS did not amend the cost allocation plan (CAP) to include changes in program administration. Therefore, the methods used to allocate the cost of the administrative offices to various Federal programs were not approved by HHS (Attachment A, pages 1 and 2). The corrective action plan indicated DHS amended the CAP to include the administrative offices (Attachment A, page 2). We recommend that, upon HHS’ approval of the amended CAP, SSA work with DHS to ensure that indirect costs charged to the Illinois DDS during State Fiscal Year 2008 were in accordance with the CAP’s approved methodologies.
The single audit also reported weaknesses in the State’s allocation of internal service fund charges to various Federal programs, including SSA. Specifically,
1. Procedures were not adequate to identify fund balances that exceeded the maximum amount allowable (Attachment A, pages 3 through 5). The corrective action plan indicated that adjustments will be made annually and interest will be imputed as compensation for any delay in refunding excess balances (Attachment A, page 5).
2. There were no employee personnel activity reports to support the payroll and fringe benefit expenditures allocated to Federal programs from the internal service funds (Attachment A, pages 6 through 8). The corrective action plan indicated the State has changed its documentation procedures (Attachment A, page 8).
3. Costs accumulated in the internal service funds were unallowable (Attachment A, pages 9 through 11). The corrective action plan indicated that only allowable expenditures are included in cost recovery rates (Attachment A, page 11).
4. Charges from the internal service funds’ information technology services were not in accordance with the State’s Cost Allocation Agreement and OMB Circular A-87 (Attachment A, pages 12 through 14). The corrective action plan indicated disagreement with the finding (Attachment A, page 14).
We recommended corrective action on these four findings to SSA in a prior report. However, SSA could not provide us with documentation of its corrective action. Therefore, we repeat the prior year’s recommendation that SSA continue to work with the Illinois DHS to verify that policies and procedures are in place to ensure charges to the Illinois DDS from the internal service funds were in accordance with the approved Cost Allocation Agreement and OMB Circular A-87 requirements.
The single audit also disclosed the State of Illinois did not have an adequate process in place to permit the timely preparation of a complete and accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Attachment B, pages 1 and 2). Although this finding was not specifically identified to SSA, it may have an impact on DDS operations. I am bringing this matter to your attention as it represents a potentially serious service delivery and financial control problem for the Agency.
Please send copies of the final Audit Clearance Document to Shannon Agee. If you have questions, contact Shannon Agee at (816) 221 0315, extension 1537.
Patrick P. O’Carroll, Jr.
Overview of the Office of the Inspector General
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is comprised of an Office of Audit (OA), Office of Investigations (OI), Office of the Counsel to the Inspector General (OCIG), Office of External Relations (OER), and Office of Technology and Resource Management (OTRM). To ensure compliance with policies and procedures, internal controls, and professional standards, the OIG also has a comprehensive Professional Responsibility and Quality Assurance program.
Office of Audit
OA conducts financial and performance audits of the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) programs and operations and makes recommendations to ensure program objectives are achieved effectively and efficiently. Financial audits assess whether SSA’s financial statements fairly present SSA’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flow. Performance audits review the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of SSA’s programs and operations. OA also conducts short-term management reviews and program evaluations on issues of concern to SSA, Congress, and the general public.
Office of Investigations
OI conducts investigations related to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement in SSA programs and operations. This includes wrongdoing by applicants, beneficiaries, contractors, third parties, or SSA employees performing their official duties. This office serves as liaison to the Department of Justice on all matters relating to the investigation of SSA programs and personnel. OI also conducts joint investigations with other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.
Office of the Counsel to the Inspector General
OCIG provides independent legal advice and counsel to the IG on various matters, including statutes, regulations, legislation, and policy directives. OCIG also advises the IG on investigative procedures and techniques, as well as on legal implications and conclusions to be drawn from audit and investigative material. Also, OCIG administers the Civil Monetary Penalty program.
Office of External Relations
OER manages OIG’s external and public affairs programs, and serves as the principal advisor on news releases and in providing information to the various news reporting services. OER develops OIG’s media and public information policies, directs OIG’s external and public affairs programs, and serves as the primary contact for those seeking information about OIG. OER prepares OIG publications, speeches, and presentations to internal and external organizations, and responds to Congressional correspondence.
Office of Technology and Resource Management
OTRM supports OIG by providing information management and systems security. OTRM also coordinates OIG’s budget, procurement, telecommunications, facilities, and human resources. In addition, OTRM is the focal point for OIG’s strategic planning function, and the development and monitoring of performance measures. In addition, OTRM receives and assigns for action allegations of criminal and administrative violations of Social Security laws, identifies fugitives receiving benefit payments from SSA, and provides technological assistance to investigations.